Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends.įor investors, the interest rate issue therefore remains the chief impediment to declaring a ‘goldilocks economy’ and being able to engage meaningfully in risk assets. Source: Bloomberg, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
While the S&P 500’s forward earnings yield stands at a not unreasonable 5.5%, this is insufficient compensation for the associated volatility given that nearly 4% can be had virtually risk-free from holding US government bonds.įigure 2: Inflation is slowing, but has a way to go until it’s back to the Fed’s official 2% target For the stock market, the interest rate issue is clearly now getting in the way of further progress. As the minutes of the latest Fed rate-setting meeting at the start of February sternly observed: “The Committee anticipates that ongoing increases in the target range will be appropriate in order to attain a stance of monetary policy that is sufficiently restrictive to return inflation to 2 percent over time.” A strong US labour report and a sideways (rather than outright lower) inflation print during February forced markets to take note, with the S&P 500 down over -2% on the month and the inflation-sensitive 10-year US Treasury yield touching nearly 4.0%. Both the Fed and the market – based on readings of the so-called ‘dot plot’ and interest rate futures – are now in broad agreement that interest rates will still need to rise to over 5.0%, significantly higher than where rates were barely a year ago and perhaps as much as two more rate hikes from where they are now. Fast forward to 2023, and the Fed has been at pains to say that more interest rate rises are to be expected. This is still high by today’s standards but was heading in the right direction. With low inflation, the US Federal Reserve (Fed) of 1983 was able to drop rates from a heady 15% to 8.5% over the course of the year. However, this is where the comparison ends. The stock market has been positive, with the S&P 500 and MSCI AC World indices up 14.5% and 18.4%, respectively, in USD terms from 12 October 2022 to the end of January this year. As for inflation, at 6.4% the US headline rate has come down from the 9.1% peak in the middle of last year. US unemployment is just 3.6%, consensus GDP growth for 2023, as surveyed by Bloomberg, has now risen to 0.75%, as at the end of February, from just 0.3% at the start of the year. Comparisons with today are understandable – to a point. The stock market liked these ‘neither too strong nor too weak’ conditions, with the S&P 500 adding a whopping 22.5% that year and going on to deliver a positive return until the early 1990s recession. After the recession of 1981-2, inflation got as low as 2.5%, unemployment fell from 11% to 9% over the course of the year and the economy grew a healthy 4.6% in real terms. Perhaps the best example of a goldilocks economy was the US in 1983. Past performance is not an indicator of future performance and current or future trends. But what exactly is a goldilocks economy and is it really a realistic scenario in the short to medium term?įigure 1: A bit less misery – is a new goldilocks phase upon us? Commentators have seized upon all this as evidence of a new ‘goldilocks’ period in the economy, with the promise of accordingly better returns for investors. Taking the so-called ‘Misery index’ (a simple sum of the US unemployment and inflation rates), at least on the surface the economic backdrop certainly appears to have improved in recent months with consumers in jobs and seeing improvements in real spending power.
At the same time, dire predictions of recession suddenly appeared to be excessively pessimistic and have since been hastily revised, with the Wall Street Journal reporting that a recent survey of economists put the risk of recession at a less-than-unanimous 61%. These included a softening of US inflation, both in the official core and headline numbers, but also an easing of global supply chains as shipping costs and delays came down. Then something changed the seeds of a more benign set of conditions began to be planted in the autumn and culminated in January of this year. Despite being beyond the memory of most market participants and commentators, comparisons with the 1970s abounded in an effort to provide some kind of framework to the perfect storm being experienced. Inflation rose, monetary policy (interest rates) started to tighten and the value of most mainstream assets adjusted downwards as a result. By Julian Howard – Lead Investment Director, Multi-Asset SolutionsĢ022 was a torrid year for markets by almost any definition.
0 kommentar(er)
